MuMMI
Home
Browse
Applications
Systems
Modeling
About
Info
Publications
Help
Contact
Application
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3
System
Chiba City at ANL
IBM SP2 at ANL
Linux supercluster at UNM
Processors
4 Processors
9 Processors
16 Processors
25 Processors
Input
problem size=102.0
problem size=36.0
problem size=64.0
Frequency
Executable
sp.A
sp.B
sp.W
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3
Download CSV
Scatter-Plot
Application-level Performance
100s
300w
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36536
Lowest Power
Lowest Energy
81.7139
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 9 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36537
40.4299
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36538
26.8212
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 25 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36539
19.5731
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36548
478.828
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 9 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36549
205.97
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36550
129.546
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 25 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36551
84.9322
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36560
2062.01
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 9 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36561
770.424
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36562
471.202
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 25 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36563
304.979
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36540
72.5336
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36541
32.5128
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36542
18.4399
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36543
Lowest Runtime
14.0974
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36555
429.606
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36554
192.239
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36553
116.17
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36552
74.8968
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36567
1591.27
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36566
748.396
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36565
442.185
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36564
305.752
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36544
90.532781
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 9 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36545
35.72785
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 16 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36546
19.560471
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 25 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36547
16.403183
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36556
535.000659
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 9 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36557
233.795672
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 16 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36558
120.014794
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 25 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36559
74.01266
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36568
2167.125079
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 9 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36569
1011.032419
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 16 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36570
571.113195
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 25 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36571
369.440103