MuMMI
Home
Browse
Applications
Systems
Modeling
About
Info
Publications
Help
Contact
Application
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3
System
Chiba City at ANL
IBM SP2 at ANL
Linux supercluster at UNM
Processors
4 Processors
9 Processors
16 Processors
25 Processors
Input
problem size=64.0
Frequency
Executable
sp.A
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; sp.A
Download CSV
Scatter-Plot
Application-level Performance
100s
300w
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36548
Lowest Power
Lowest Energy
478.828
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 9 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36549
205.97
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36550
129.546
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 25 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36551
84.9322
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36555
429.606
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36554
192.239
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36553
116.17
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36552
74.8968
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36556
535.000659
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 9 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36557
233.795672
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 16 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36558
120.014794
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Chiba City at ANL; 25 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36559
Lowest Runtime
74.01266