MuMMI
Home
Browse
Applications
Systems
Modeling
About
Info
Publications
Help
Contact
Application
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3
System
IBM SP2 at ANL
Processors
2 Processors
4 Processors
8 Processors
16 Processors
32 Processors
Input
Class A=14000.0
problem size=1400.0
Problem size=1400.0
problem size=14000.0
problem size=150000.0
problem size=7000.0
problem size=75000.0
problem=14000.0
Frequency
Executable
cg_A_16_sp2
cg_A_2_sp2
cg_A_32_sp2
cg_A_4_sp2
cg_A_8_sp2
cg_B_16_sp2
cg_B_2_sp2
cg_B_32_sp2
cg_B_4_sp2
cg_B_8_sp2
cg_C_16_sp2
cg_C_32_sp2
cg_C_8_sp2
cg_S_16_sp2
cg_S_2_sp2
cg_S_32_sp2
cg_S_4_sp2
cg_S_8_sp2
cg_W_16_sp2
cg_W_2_sp2
cg_W_32_sp2
cg_W_4_sp2
cg_W_8_sp2
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL
Download CSV
Scatter-Plot
Application-level Performance
100s
300w
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 2 Processors; cg_S_2_sp2; Problem size=1400.0
248
Lowest Power
Lowest Energy
1.02
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 2 Processors; cg_W_2_sp2; problem size=7000.0
249
5.6
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 2 Processors; cg_A_2_sp2; Class A=14000.0
250
22.94
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 2 Processors; cg_B_2_sp2; problem size=75000.0
251
3000.53
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; cg_S_4_sp2; problem size=1400.0
252
0.74
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; cg_W_4_sp2; problem size=7000.0
253
3.62
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; cg_A_4_sp2; problem=14000.0
254
13.08
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; cg_B_4_sp2; problem size=75000.0
255
1546.32
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; cg_S_8_sp2; problem size=1400.0
256
0.6
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; cg_W_8_sp2; problem size=7000.0
257
2.33
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; cg_A_8_sp2; problem size=14000.0
258
6.5
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; cg_B_8_sp2; problem size=75000.0
259
634.28
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; cg_C_8_sp2; problem size=150000.0
260
2036.93
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; cg_S_16_sp2; problem size=1400.0
261
Lowest Runtime
0.49
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; cg_W_16_sp2; problem size=7000.0
262
1.78
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; cg_A_16_sp2; problem size=14000.0
263
4.42
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; cg_B_16_sp2; problem size=75000.0
264
343.45
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; cg_C_16_sp2; problem size=150000.0
265
1069.24
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; cg_S_32_sp2; problem size=1400.0
266
0.54
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; cg_W_32_sp2; problem size=7000.0
267
1.74
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; cg_A_32_sp2; problem size=14000.0
268
2.99
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; cg_B_32_sp2; problem size=75000.0
269
120.96
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; cg_C_32_sp2; problem size=150000.0
270
467.4