MuMMI
Home
Browse
Applications
Systems
Modeling
About
Info
Publications
Help
Contact
Application
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3
System
ECE SGI Origin2000
IBM SP2 at ANL
Processors
2 Processors
4 Processors
8 Processors
16 Processors
32 Processors
Input
Class A=23.0
Class B=25.0
Class S=16.0
Class W=20.0
problem size=23.0
problem size=25.0
problem size=27.0
Frequency
Executable
is_A_16_sp2
is_A_2_sgi
is_A_2_sp2
is_A_32_sp2
is_A_4_sgi
is_A_4_sp2
is_A_8_sgi
is_A_8_sp2
is_B_16_sp2
is_B_32_sp2
is_B_4_sp2
is_B_8_sp2
is_C_16_sp2
is_C_32_sp2
is_S_16_sp2
is_S_2_sp2
is_S_32_sp2
is_S_4_sp2
is_S_8_sp2
is_W_16_sp2
is_W_2_sp2
is_W_32_sp2
is_W_4_sp2
is_W_8_sp2
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3
Download CSV
Scatter-Plot
Application-level Performance
100s
300w
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; ECE SGI Origin2000; 8 Processors; is_A_8_sgi; Class A=23.0
279
Lowest Power
Lowest Energy
6.314647
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; ECE SGI Origin2000; 8 Processors; is_A_8_sgi
280
6.314707
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; ECE SGI Origin2000; 4 Processors; is_A_4_sgi; Class A=23.0
281
13.576732
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; ECE SGI Origin2000; 2 Processors; is_A_2_sgi; Class A=23.0
282
27.14525
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 2 Processors; is_S_2_sp2; Class S=16.0
283
0.08
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; is_S_4_sp2; Class S=16.0
284
Lowest Runtime
0.06
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; is_S_8_sp2; Class S=16.0
285
0.07
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; is_S_16_sp2; Class S=16.0
286
0.07
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; is_S_32_sp2; Class S=16.0
287
0.08
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; is_W_32_sp2
288
0.22
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; is_W_16_sp2
289
0.31
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; is_W_8_sp2; Class W=20.0
290
0.51
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; is_W_4_sp2; Class W=20.0
291
1.14
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 2 Processors; is_W_2_sp2; Class W=20.0
292
2.24
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 2 Processors; is_A_2_sp2; Class A=23.0
293
21.2
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; is_A_4_sp2; problem size=23.0
294
11.0
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; is_A_8_sp2
295
5.71
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; is_A_16_sp2; Class A=23.0
296
2.82
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; is_A_32_sp2; Class A=23.0
297
1.66
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; is_B_32_sp2; Class B=25.0
298
6.96
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; is_B_16_sp2; Class B=25.0
299
12.29
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; is_B_8_sp2; problem size=25.0
300
22.99
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; is_B_4_sp2; problem size=25.0
301
44.23
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; is_C_16_sp2; problem size=27.0
302
49.06
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; is_C_32_sp2; problem size=27.0
303
28.49