NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0

Download CSV Scatter-Plot

Application-level Performance

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; bt.W.4.sp2; Class W=24.0

• 379 Lowest Power Lowest Energy
  28.1184

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 9 Processors; bt.W.9.sp2; Class W=24.0

• 380
  14.6031

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; bt.W.16.sp2; Class W=24.0

• 381
  9.8032

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 25 Processors; bt.W.25.sp2; Class W=24.0

• 382
  7.5263

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; bt.A.4.sp2; Class A=64.0

• 383
  572.805

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 9 Processors; bt.A.9.sp2; Class A=64.0

• 384
  263.628

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; bt.A.16.sp2; Class A=64.0

• 385
  156.33

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 25 Processors; bt.A.25.sp2; Class A=64.0

• 386
  107.708

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; bt.W.4; Class W=24.0

• 387
  22.7557

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; bt.W.9; Class W=24.0

• 388
  12.1348

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; bt.W.16; Class W=24.0

• 389
  6.77772

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; bt.W.25; Class W=24.0

• 390 Lowest Runtime
  4.53443

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; bt.B.4; Class B=102.0

• 391
  2068.5

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; bt.B.9; Class B=102.0

• 392
  1033.56

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; bt.B.16; Class B=102.0

• 393
  595.765

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; bt.B.25; Class B=102.0

• 394
  374.067

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; bt.A.4; Class A=64.0

• 36608
  521.825

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; bt.A.9; Class A=64.0

• 36609
  249.824

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; bt.A.16; Class A=64.0

• 36610
  147.682

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; bt.A.25; Class A=64.0

• 36611
  87.8139

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 4 Processors; bt.W.4; Class W=24.0

• 36612
  30.27676

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 9 Processors; bt.W.9; Class W=24.0

• 36613
  14.290695

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 16 Processors; bt.W.16; Class W=24.0

• 36614
  6.942227

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 25 Processors; bt.W.25; Class W=24.0

• 36615
  5.013352

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 25 Processors; bt.A.25; Class A=64.0

• 36616
  116.869298

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 16 Processors; bt.A.16; Class A=64.0

• 36617
  182.475647

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 9 Processors; bt.A.9; Class A=64.0

• 36618
  314.486067

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 4 Processors; bt.A.4; Class A=64.0

• 36619
  692.00828

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 4 Processors; bt.B.4; Class B=102.0

• 36620
  2832.241127

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 9 Processors; bt.B.9; Class B=102.0

• 36621
  1316.262977

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 16 Processors; bt.B.16; Class B=102.0

• 36622
  749.314806

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Chiba City at ANL; 25 Processors; bt.B.25; Class B=102.0

• 36623
  488.091197