MuMMI
Home
Browse
Applications
Systems
Modeling
About
Info
Publications
Help
Contact
Application
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0
System
IBM SP2 at ANL
Processors
32 Processors
Input
Class A=23.0
Class A=256.0
Class A=28.0
Class B=25.0
Class B=256.0
Class B=30.0
Class B=512.0
Class C=32.0
Class C=512.0
Class S=16.0
Class S=24.0
Class S=32.0
Class S=64.0
Class W=128.0
Class W=25.0
Class W=64.0
problem size=1400.0
problem size=14000.0
problem size=150000.0
problem size=27.0
problem size=7000.0
problem size=75000.0
Frequency
Executable
cg_A_32_sp2
cg_B_32_sp2
cg_C_32_sp2
cg_S_32_sp2
cg_W_32_sp2
ep.A.32
ep.B.32
ep.C.32
ep.S.32
ep.W.32
ft.A.32
ft.B.32
ft.C.32
ft.S.32
ft.W.32
is_A_32_sp2
is_B_32_sp2
is_C_32_sp2
is_S_32_sp2
is_W_32_sp2
mg.A.32
mg.B.32
mg.S.32
mg.W.32
IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors
Download CSV
Scatter-Plot
Application-level Performance
100s
300w
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; cg_S_32_sp2; problem size=1400.0
266
Lowest Power
Lowest Energy
0.54
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; cg_W_32_sp2; problem size=7000.0
267
1.74
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; cg_A_32_sp2; problem size=14000.0
268
2.99
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; cg_B_32_sp2; problem size=75000.0
269
120.96
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; cg_C_32_sp2; problem size=150000.0
270
467.4
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; is_S_32_sp2; Class S=16.0
287
0.08
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; is_W_32_sp2
288
0.22
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; is_A_32_sp2; Class A=23.0
297
1.66
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; is_B_32_sp2; Class B=25.0
298
6.96
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; is_C_32_sp2; problem size=27.0
303
28.49
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ft.A.32; Class A=256.0
310
6.94
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ft.C.32; Class C=512.0
311
6307.86
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ft.B.32; Class B=512.0
312
104.3
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ft.W.32; Class W=128.0
315
0.36
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ft.S.32; Class S=64.0
324
0.19
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; mg.S.32; Class S=32.0
345
Lowest Runtime
0.04
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; mg.W.32; Class W=64.0
346
0.98
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; mg.A.32; Class A=256.0
347
2.46
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; mg.B.32; Class B=256.0
348
11.75
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ep.S.32; Class S=24.0
369
0.86
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ep.W.32; Class W=25.0
370
1.74
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ep.A.32; Class A=28.0
371
13.59
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ep.B.32; Class B=30.0
372
54.54
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ep.C.32; Class C=32.0
373
216.47