MuMMI
Home
Browse
Applications
Systems
Modeling
About
Info
Publications
Help
Contact
Application
NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3
System
IBM SP2 at ANL
Processors
4 Processors
Input
Class A=256.0
Class A=28.0
Class A=64.0
Class B=256.0
Class B=30.0
Class C=32.0
Class S=16.0
Class S=24.0
Class S=32.0
Class S=64.0
Class W=128.0
Class W=20.0
Class W=24.0
Class W=25.0
Class W=64.0
problem size=102.0
problem size=1400.0
problem size=23.0
problem size=25.0
problem size=36.0
problem size=64.0
problem size=7000.0
problem size=75000.0
problem=14000.0
Frequency
Executable
bt.A.4.sp2
bt.W.4.sp2
cg_A_4_sp2
cg_B_4_sp2
cg_S_4_sp2
cg_W_4_sp2
ep.A.4
ep.B.4
ep.C.4
ep.S.4
ep.W.4
ft.S.4
ft.W.4
is_A_4_sp2
is_B_4_sp2
is_S_4_sp2
is_W_4_sp2
mg.A.4
mg.B.4
mg.S.4
mg.W.4
sp.A
sp.B
sp.W
IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors
Download CSV
Scatter-Plot
Application-level Performance
100s
300w
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; cg_S_4_sp2; problem size=1400.0
252
Lowest Power
Lowest Energy
0.74
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; cg_W_4_sp2; problem size=7000.0
253
3.62
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; cg_A_4_sp2; problem=14000.0
254
13.08
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; cg_B_4_sp2; problem size=75000.0
255
1546.32
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; is_S_4_sp2; Class S=16.0
284
Lowest Runtime
0.06
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; is_W_4_sp2; Class W=20.0
291
1.14
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; is_A_4_sp2; problem size=23.0
294
11.0
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; is_B_4_sp2; problem size=25.0
301
44.23
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; ft.W.4; Class W=128.0
318
2.15
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; ft.S.4; Class S=64.0
321
0.85
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; mg.B.4; Class B=256.0
333
68.31
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; mg.A.4; Class A=256.0
334
14.79
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; mg.W.4; Class W=64.0
335
4.04
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; mg.S.4; Class S=32.0
336
0.08
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; ep.C.4; Class C=32.0
354
1728.48
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; ep.B.4; Class B=30.0
355
435.68
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; ep.A.4; Class A=28.0
356
108.04
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; ep.W.4; Class W=25.0
357
13.56
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; ep.S.4; Class S=24.0
358
6.74
NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; bt.W.4.sp2; Class W=24.0
379
28.1184
NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; bt.A.4.sp2; Class A=64.0
383
572.805
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0
36536
81.7139
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0
36548
478.828
NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0
36560
2062.01