MuMMI
Home
Browse
Applications
Systems
Modeling
About
Info
Publications
Help
Contact
Application
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0
System
IBM SP2 at ANL
Processors
8 Processors
Input
Class A=256.0
Class A=28.0
Class B=256.0
Class B=30.0
Class B=512.0
Class C=32.0
Class S=16.0
Class S=24.0
Class S=32.0
Class S=64.0
Class W=128.0
Class W=20.0
Class W=25.0
Class W=64.0
problem size=1400.0
problem size=14000.0
problem size=150000.0
problem size=25.0
problem size=7000.0
problem size=75000.0
Frequency
Executable
cg_A_8_sp2
cg_B_8_sp2
cg_C_8_sp2
cg_S_8_sp2
cg_W_8_sp2
ep.A.8
ep.B.8
ep.C.8
ep.S.8
ep.W.8
ft.A.8
ft.B.8
ft.S.8
ft.W.8
is_A_8_sp2
is_B_8_sp2
is_S_8_sp2
is_W_8_sp2
mg.A.8
mg.B.8
mg.S.8
mg.W.8
IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors
Download CSV
Scatter-Plot
Application-level Performance
100s
300w
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; cg_S_8_sp2; problem size=1400.0
256
Lowest Power
Lowest Energy
0.6
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; cg_W_8_sp2; problem size=7000.0
257
2.33
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; cg_A_8_sp2; problem size=14000.0
258
6.5
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; cg_B_8_sp2; problem size=75000.0
259
634.28
NAS Parallel CG Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; cg_C_8_sp2; problem size=150000.0
260
2036.93
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; is_S_8_sp2; Class S=16.0
285
0.07
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; is_W_8_sp2; Class W=20.0
290
0.51
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; is_A_8_sp2
295
5.71
NAS Parallel IS Benchmark 2.3; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; is_B_8_sp2; problem size=25.0
300
22.99
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ft.A.8; Class A=256.0
308
26.6
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ft.B.8; Class B=512.0
314
3292.51
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ft.W.8; Class W=128.0
317
1.22
NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ft.S.8; Class S=64.0
322
0.48
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; mg.S.8; Class S=32.0
337
0.05
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; mg.W.8; Class W=64.0
338
1.88
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; mg.A.8; Class A=256.0
339
Lowest Runtime
0.0
NAS Parallel MG Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; mg.B.8; Class B=256.0
340
32.52
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ep.S.8; Class S=24.0
359
3.4
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ep.W.8; Class W=25.0
360
6.79
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ep.A.8; Class A=28.0
361
54.07
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ep.B.8; Class B=30.0
362
224.05
NAS Parallel EP Benchmarks 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ep.C.8; Class C=32.0
363
879.94