Linux supercluster at UNM

Download CSV Scatter-Plot

Application-level Performance

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; bt.W.4; Class W=24.0

• 387 Lowest Power Lowest Energy
  22.7557

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; bt.W.9; Class W=24.0

• 388
  12.1348

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; bt.W.16; Class W=24.0

• 389
  6.77772

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; bt.W.25; Class W=24.0

• 390 Lowest Runtime
  4.53443

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; bt.B.4; Class B=102.0

• 391
  2068.5

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; bt.B.9; Class B=102.0

• 392
  1033.56

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; bt.B.16; Class B=102.0

• 393
  595.765

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; bt.B.25; Class B=102.0

• 394
  374.067

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0

• 36540
  72.5336

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0

• 36541
  32.5128

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0

• 36542
  18.4399

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; sp.W; problem size=36.0

• 36543
  14.0974

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0

• 36555
  429.606

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0

• 36554
  192.239

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0

• 36553
  116.17

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; sp.A; problem size=64.0

• 36552
  74.8968

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0

• 36567
  1591.27

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0

• 36566
  748.396

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0

• 36565
  442.185

NAS Parallel SP Benchmarks 2.3; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; sp.B; problem size=102.0

• 36564
  305.752

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 4 Processors; bt.A.4; Class A=64.0

• 36608
  521.825

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 9 Processors; bt.A.9; Class A=64.0

• 36609
  249.824

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 16 Processors; bt.A.16; Class A=64.0

• 36610
  147.682

NAS Parallel BT Benchmarks 2.0; Linux supercluster at UNM; 25 Processors; bt.A.25; Class A=64.0

• 36611
  87.8139